Search This Blog

Monday, May 21, 2012

State office building opposed by Governor


The state capitol will not be getting a new office building if Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead continues to oppose the project, citing the budget cuts as reason enough to stall the plan, according to an article by the WyomingTribune Eagle.
The design study would cost the state $4.4 million, a cost that Mead left off his proposed 2013-14 budget plan. The legislators are not in agreement over whether the state should spend the money on this office building when the threat of budget cuts looms. The split in the legislature could possibly waste the $4.4 million if the study is approved and the legislature later decides to drop the project, the article said.
The office building in question, which would be built on Pioneer Avenue where Safeway was, would house the legislature and governor while renovations to the Capitol building are completed. The capitol renovations project itself would cost roughly $50 million, the article said. After the renovations are completed, the office building would be used to house state agencies that currently lease office space. The office building would cost about $80 million.
Proponents of the new building say it is necessary to move quickly on both projects. Rep. Pete Illoway, R-Cheyenne, the co-chairman of the Select Committee on Legislative Facilities, said he thought the capitol renovations could not be ignored and necessitated action.
Rich Cathcart, the state’s construction management administrator, said the office building project needed to be completed swiftly because building codes might change and make the design study outdated and useless.
Another argument for the projects is the money the office building would save the state every year by housing state agencies that would no longer have to lease office space, according to an article by the CasperStar-Tribune.
However, in another article by the Wyoming TribuneEagle, a local economist said the new office building could damage the economy and commercial real estate market of the area. Richard O’Gara, a local economist and president of the privately-run Wyoming Center for Business and Economic Analysis Inc., said the vacancy rate of the area would go up if the new office building were completed. He said the vacancy rate is already at 19.4 percent and would go even higher as property owners will be forced to lower their prices to be competitive in a market with high supply and low demand.
In the article, Mead said he opposed the state office building plan going forward at this time. The budget cuts implemented this year in the legislature and new budget cuts on the horizon could signal a stall of the project until funds are not so tight within the state.
Perhaps the news that the office building could harm the economy of the downtown area will change the minds of some of the state legislators before the next session. As things stand, I do not believe now is a good time to be expanding anything in the state while budgets are being cut. The state legislature is supposed to protect the interest of the residents of Wyoming and the businesses that call our state home. The new office building is not in the best interests of the residents, so it should not be built. Can the legislators not lease a building to meet in while the capitol is being renovated? If those renovations are necessary for safety, then complete them, but that does not mean the businesses of Cheyenne must suffer for it.

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Should Obama abandon Afghanistan war effort?

The blog that I published earlier today had a grammatical error in the third paragraph. Two words ran together. The text said "inAfghanistan" and it should had said "in Afghanistan."

The United States has been in the midst of a war in Afghanistan and the Middle East for more than 10 years and now might be the time for President Barack Obama to call the troops home.
Supporters of continued military action say the U.S. is defeating Al Qaeda and the Taliban, and withdrawing troops would be a setback to the war on terrorism. They say continued U.S. presence there is necessary to make sure the democratic government in Afghanistan will continue.
However, Osama Bin Laden was found and killed, more than 1,800 American service men and women have lost their lives in the conflict in Afghanistan alone and the cost of the war is now over $527 billion.
Looking simply at the facts, whether continued conflict in Afghanistan is warranted or not comes down to two questions, and the answers will tell us if staying in Afghanistan is worth the price the United States is paying and has already paid.
  1. Do we think we can solve the problems in Afghanistan with military force?
  2. Are we close enough to the end of the war to justify our continued presence in Afghanistan? To make it simple—is the end in sight?
My answer is “No.”

Should Obama abandon Afghanistan war effort?

The United States has been in the midst of a war in Afghanistan and the Middle East for more than 10 years and now might be the time for President Barack Obama to call the troops home.

Supporters of continued military action say the U.S. is defeating Al Qaeda and the Taliban, and withdrawing troops would be a setback to the war on terrorism. They say continued U.S. presence there is necessary to make sure the democratic government in Afghanistan will continue.
However, Osama Bin Laden was found and killed, more than 1,800 American service men and women have lost their lives in the conflict in Afghanistan alone and the cost of the war is now over $527 billion.
Looking simply at the facts, whether continued conflict inAfghanistan is warranted or not comes down to two questions, and the answers will tell us if staying in Afghanistan is worth the price the United States is paying and has already paid.
  1. Do we think we can solve the problems in Afghanistan with military force?
  2. Are we close enough to the end of the war to justify our continued presence in Afghanistan? To make it simple—is the end in sight?
My answer is “No.”